Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 rum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 617187" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>Tumbleweed....I would agree with that but the point I was trying to make was that thin skinned (target type) bullets WILL blow up at higher velocities. In order for them to be most effective on heavier game such as elk, a lot of mass is required. I'm not saying a 215 isn't a good choice, and as you point out, is a little better "overall" balistically at extreme ranges. My point being, the biggest weakness of a Berger is the ability to penetrate in EVERY instance. The best way to overcome that is a LOT of mass. Therefore, in most cases, I would take the mass over a slight advantage in trajectory. At the distance where expansion becomes a problem with the Berger, the 215 MIGHT be a better option providing velocity is actually higher at that given range. Another way to look at this would be, a Barnes mono uses a different killing principle. They don't require a lot of mass and are often lighter in weight. They can get away with this because penetration is not a problem, but they need expansion also to cause tissue damage. Tissue damage is not an issue with a Berger but causing the damage DEEPER inside the organs sometimes can be. Thus the mass issue IMO.......Rich</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 617187, member: 13833"] Tumbleweed....I would agree with that but the point I was trying to make was that thin skinned (target type) bullets WILL blow up at higher velocities. In order for them to be most effective on heavier game such as elk, a lot of mass is required. I'm not saying a 215 isn't a good choice, and as you point out, is a little better "overall" balistically at extreme ranges. My point being, the biggest weakness of a Berger is the ability to penetrate in EVERY instance. The best way to overcome that is a LOT of mass. Therefore, in most cases, I would take the mass over a slight advantage in trajectory. At the distance where expansion becomes a problem with the Berger, the 215 MIGHT be a better option providing velocity is actually higher at that given range. Another way to look at this would be, a Barnes mono uses a different killing principle. They don't require a lot of mass and are often lighter in weight. They can get away with this because penetration is not a problem, but they need expansion also to cause tissue damage. Tissue damage is not an issue with a Berger but causing the damage DEEPER inside the organs sometimes can be. Thus the mass issue IMO.......Rich [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 rum
Top