Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 RUM load development questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tidesloe" data-source="post: 777806" data-attributes="member: 47761"><p>Thats awesome!, more consistency (smaller aggregates) is exactly my goal. </p><p> </p><p>I agree with you on the neck irregularities being pushed back out with bullet seating, and that it doesn't matter, as the necks dont contact the chamber walls when fired anyway. but I do ask if these slight irregularities in the necks after sizing and pushed to the inside of neck can cause a slight irregularity in neck tension leading to decreased accuracy? Hope I'm not sounding like a smart _ _ _ here. I'm very green in this pursuit, and just have many questions. Im completely open to all your input. I depend on you guy's with knowledge and experience. I want to eliminate all variables I can, but then the issue of a separate expanding operation with a separate die has the potential to cause concentricity problems as well. It is more steps, and another potential to produce a problem, but I haven't seen a problem there yet. Possibly in the end it amounts to six in one hand, and half a dozen in the other, and I eliminate the neck expanding. I dont know anything for sure yet other than I have a lot to learn. </p><p>I couldn't do it without you, and the other guy's willing to share their experience.</p><p>I could use an opinion on further testing. I would like to do a ladder test, but only have access to a 200 yd range, without traveling a couple of hours, or packing all my gear a couple miles back into the Natl Forest. Would a round robin type test at 200 be a resonable method? If so, do you have any advice or suggestions?</p><p>Thanks again, I'll definitely be back in touch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tidesloe, post: 777806, member: 47761"] Thats awesome!, more consistency (smaller aggregates) is exactly my goal. I agree with you on the neck irregularities being pushed back out with bullet seating, and that it doesn't matter, as the necks dont contact the chamber walls when fired anyway. but I do ask if these slight irregularities in the necks after sizing and pushed to the inside of neck can cause a slight irregularity in neck tension leading to decreased accuracy? Hope I'm not sounding like a smart _ _ _ here. I'm very green in this pursuit, and just have many questions. Im completely open to all your input. I depend on you guy's with knowledge and experience. I want to eliminate all variables I can, but then the issue of a separate expanding operation with a separate die has the potential to cause concentricity problems as well. It is more steps, and another potential to produce a problem, but I haven't seen a problem there yet. Possibly in the end it amounts to six in one hand, and half a dozen in the other, and I eliminate the neck expanding. I dont know anything for sure yet other than I have a lot to learn. I couldn't do it without you, and the other guy's willing to share their experience. I could use an opinion on further testing. I would like to do a ladder test, but only have access to a 200 yd range, without traveling a couple of hours, or packing all my gear a couple miles back into the Natl Forest. Would a round robin type test at 200 be a resonable method? If so, do you have any advice or suggestions? Thanks again, I'll definitely be back in touch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 RUM load development questions
Top