Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
2A being ignored in NM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xsn10s" data-source="post: 2901455" data-attributes="member: 95344"><p>"In a 4–3 decision, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial courts' dismissal of the complaints against the District of Columbia and individual members of the Metropolitan Police Department based on the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_duty_doctrine" target="_blank">public duty doctrine</a> ruling that "the duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists". The Court thus adopted the trial court's determination that no special relationship existed between the police and appellants, and therefore no specific legal duty existed between the police and the appellants." <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xsn10s, post: 2901455, member: 95344"] "In a 4–3 decision, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial courts' dismissal of the complaints against the District of Columbia and individual members of the Metropolitan Police Department based on the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_duty_doctrine']public duty doctrine[/URL] ruling that "the duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists". The Court thus adopted the trial court's determination that no special relationship existed between the police and appellants, and therefore no specific legal duty existed between the police and the appellants." [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
2A being ignored in NM
Top