Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
277 SIG Fury
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2857859" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>What an interesting project!</p><p></p><p>I have experience with the boring old .270 win out of a 22 inch barrel, my first hunting rifle actually. But very limited bullets tried, not because I've never shot it much but because I had a good stash of a few very sufficient pills and never found need of more. </p><p></p><p>They are the plain vanilla hornady interlocks and they're very good at turning deer into venison <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😁" title="Beaming face with smiling eyes :grin:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f601.png" data-shortname=":grin:" /></p><p></p><p>I've used the 130 and 150 flat base and the 140 btsp. The 140 in my subjective perception and very limited sample size does not seem to be quite as emphatic as either of the flat base offerings. That's not to say there's anything wrong with it but I prefer the 130 and 150 after experience with all 3. </p><p></p><p>The 130 interlock honestly punches way above it's weight and pay grade. Might as well be a partition. I've had it exit after smashing both shoulders on a doe and blowing everything in between them all to heck. It is violent. It penetrates. It is better than any other basic soft point. Nuff said. </p><p></p><p>HOWEVER,..while the difference isn't much either way, the 150 is slightly but noticably less of a meat destroyer hitting the shoulder inside 200 yards. On does or lighter framed deer though it doesn't quite have the zapped by lighting effect that the 130 does. </p><p></p><p>I'm splitting hairs but I really have observed these differences. At the end of the day they're both just awesome affordable no nonsense bullets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2857859, member: 109862"] What an interesting project! I have experience with the boring old .270 win out of a 22 inch barrel, my first hunting rifle actually. But very limited bullets tried, not because I’ve never shot it much but because I had a good stash of a few very sufficient pills and never found need of more. They are the plain vanilla hornady interlocks and they’re very good at turning deer into venison 😁 I’ve used the 130 and 150 flat base and the 140 btsp. The 140 in my subjective perception and very limited sample size does not seem to be quite as emphatic as either of the flat base offerings. That’s not to say there’s anything wrong with it but I prefer the 130 and 150 after experience with all 3. The 130 interlock honestly punches way above it’s weight and pay grade. Might as well be a partition. I’ve had it exit after smashing both shoulders on a doe and blowing everything in between them all to heck. It is violent. It penetrates. It is better than any other basic soft point. Nuff said. HOWEVER,..while the difference isn’t much either way, the 150 is slightly but noticably less of a meat destroyer hitting the shoulder inside 200 yards. On does or lighter framed deer though it doesn’t quite have the zapped by lighting effect that the 130 does. I’m splitting hairs but I really have observed these differences. At the end of the day they’re both just awesome affordable no nonsense bullets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
277 SIG Fury
Top