Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 WM or 26 Nosler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jud96" data-source="post: 918814" data-attributes="member: 69478"><p>That would be a wasted action, was just trying to pitch into the discussion. I have seen several loads where the 6.5 Remington launches 129s-130s at 3200ish. According to Hogdon's loading data site when using the same powder, H4831, the .264 burns 55grns and goes 2850fps with a 140gr and the 6.5 REM burns 54grns and goes 2950fps! Pretty crazy numbers, to get the .264 at its full potential they shot 63.5grs of Retumbo with a 140 going 3030fps, that's exactly 9.5gns more powder to gain roughly 80fps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jud96, post: 918814, member: 69478"] That would be a wasted action, was just trying to pitch into the discussion. I have seen several loads where the 6.5 Remington launches 129s-130s at 3200ish. According to Hogdon's loading data site when using the same powder, H4831, the .264 burns 55grns and goes 2850fps with a 140gr and the 6.5 REM burns 54grns and goes 2950fps! Pretty crazy numbers, to get the .264 at its full potential they shot 63.5grs of Retumbo with a 140 going 3030fps, that's exactly 9.5gns more powder to gain roughly 80fps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 WM or 26 Nosler
Top