Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 win mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MagnumManiac" data-source="post: 2201464" data-attributes="member: 10755"><p>The 6.5WSM & 264WM are virtually ballistic twins. The 264, with the right twist of 8" or faster, should be just ahead with 156g/160g class of bullets since it hold a little more powder.</p><p>My own custom guns have .220" long throats to accomodate the 142g-156g bullets.</p><p>I have zero interest in solid VLD's for this cartridge as they are sooooo long that it is a negative return in how far you have to hang them out there.</p><p></p><p>Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MagnumManiac, post: 2201464, member: 10755"] The 6.5WSM & 264WM are virtually ballistic twins. The 264, with the right twist of 8” or faster, should be just ahead with 156g/160g class of bullets since it hold a little more powder. My own custom guns have .220” long throats to accomodate the 142g-156g bullets. I have zero interest in solid VLD’s for this cartridge as they are sooooo long that it is a negative return in how far you have to hang them out there. Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 win mag
Top