Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
2000yard MOAG pics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4ked Horn" data-source="post: 65385" data-attributes="member: 11"><p>[ QUOTE ]</p><p>Dang it. I hate it when I can't find the post I'm looking for. Somewhere, somebody asked if I would take a pic of the round next to a .308 to show size. Well, I don't have a .308 round to show, but here are some other familiar rounds next to the fat pig.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ] </p><p></p><p>Yep. That was me. I went looking for that same post so I could quote it here for you.</p><p></p><p>Whatever. I looked and couldn't find it either. Oh well.</p><p></p><p>Dang cool photo. I love shots of loaded rounds all shiny and sleek.</p><p></p><p> [ QUOTE ]</p><p> I found the .338 L imp to look and exhibit similiar properties to the 6.5-.284. They look almost identical proportionately. Similiar neck length, similair body fatness in relation to caliber, same shoulder angle, same length body in relation to the rest of the case, and so on. </p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ] </p><p></p><p>Same thing with the .223 and the .300 win mag. I noticed this several years ago when trying to explain what I knew about case efficiency and inherent accuracy to my brother.</p><p></p><p>You want to do something fun? set the camera on the table and place the smaller rounds (.223 and 6.5) close to the lens (still able to focus easily) then set the larger rounds farther back on the table so they appear to have the same height brass as the smaller of each pair and post a photo of this to help illustrate your point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4ked Horn, post: 65385, member: 11"] [ QUOTE ] Dang it. I hate it when I can't find the post I'm looking for. Somewhere, somebody asked if I would take a pic of the round next to a .308 to show size. Well, I don't have a .308 round to show, but here are some other familiar rounds next to the fat pig. [/ QUOTE ] Yep. That was me. I went looking for that same post so I could quote it here for you. Whatever. I looked and couldn't find it either. Oh well. Dang cool photo. I love shots of loaded rounds all shiny and sleek. [ QUOTE ] I found the .338 L imp to look and exhibit similiar properties to the 6.5-.284. They look almost identical proportionately. Similiar neck length, similair body fatness in relation to caliber, same shoulder angle, same length body in relation to the rest of the case, and so on. [/ QUOTE ] Same thing with the .223 and the .300 win mag. I noticed this several years ago when trying to explain what I knew about case efficiency and inherent accuracy to my brother. You want to do something fun? set the camera on the table and place the smaller rounds (.223 and 6.5) close to the lens (still able to focus easily) then set the larger rounds farther back on the table so they appear to have the same height brass as the smaller of each pair and post a photo of this to help illustrate your point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
2000yard MOAG pics
Top