Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
168 vs 208gr in 300 WSM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dk17hmr" data-source="post: 409107" data-attributes="member: 21384"><p>Went from Winchester Large Rifle to Remington 9 1/2's, groups didnt change much.</p><p> </p><p>I have heard that 178gr A-Max would be better, but looking at the BC of the 2 bullets there isnt much of a difference.....not like the 208.</p><p> </p><p>I think it is obvious that I need to build a rifle for shooting the 208. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dk17hmr, post: 409107, member: 21384"] Went from Winchester Large Rifle to Remington 9 1/2's, groups didnt change much. I have heard that 178gr A-Max would be better, but looking at the BC of the 2 bullets there isnt much of a difference.....not like the 208. I think it is obvious that I need to build a rifle for shooting the 208. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
168 vs 208gr in 300 WSM
Top