Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
150 Scirocco vs 160 accubond
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derek M." data-source="post: 212690" data-attributes="member: 2693"><p>I shot 2 bears in British Columbia last month. One was taken with a shoulder shot from my .06 using the 168 Tipped Triple Shock. Stuffed this bullet over a max charge of Reloder 19. Shot wasn't far, but I couldn't see any remarkable difference in its performance v. the 180 Accubond, which was used to kill the other bear, also a shoulder shot. </p><p></p><p>One bullet you didn't mention is the new Nosler E-tip. I have a batch of those that I also plan to play with in my 270 Allen Mag.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derek M., post: 212690, member: 2693"] I shot 2 bears in British Columbia last month. One was taken with a shoulder shot from my .06 using the 168 Tipped Triple Shock. Stuffed this bullet over a max charge of Reloder 19. Shot wasn't far, but I couldn't see any remarkable difference in its performance v. the 180 Accubond, which was used to kill the other bear, also a shoulder shot. One bullet you didn't mention is the new Nosler E-tip. I have a batch of those that I also plan to play with in my 270 Allen Mag. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
150 Scirocco vs 160 accubond
Top