Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
143 Hammer Hunter vs 169 Hammer Hunter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JakeC" data-source="post: 2980298" data-attributes="member: 115819"><p>Well it aounds like you've tested it a lot better than me! I can see why you're after it though, and like I said I bet you can still get some excellent velocity, I wouldn't sweat performance. The numbers didn't add up for me because my action is a little on the soft side and only 3" so I just can't drive them as hard. The result is that the light ones will pass the 155+ around 700. With yours though, why not. You'd still get what 3100+ with the 170-ish hammers?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JakeC, post: 2980298, member: 115819"] Well it aounds like you’ve tested it a lot better than me! I can see why you’re after it though, and like I said I bet you can still get some excellent velocity, I wouldn’t sweat performance. The numbers didn’t add up for me because my action is a little on the soft side and only 3” so I just can’t drive them as hard. The result is that the light ones will pass the 155+ around 700. With yours though, why not. You’d still get what 3100+ with the 170-ish hammers? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
143 Hammer Hunter vs 169 Hammer Hunter
Top