Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
143 Hammer Hunter vs 169 Hammer Hunter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bob Wright" data-source="post: 2980008" data-attributes="member: 104363"><p>I was running my 7RM at 3300 (mv) fps at 600 yards and the 143HH. It was right at 1/2 moa (3" groups) and accurate to the advertised bc at 7000 feet. I took my first deer with it and it was effective to say the least. I don't think I have enough twist to run the 170 class HH however. Mine is 8.5 twist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bob Wright, post: 2980008, member: 104363"] I was running my 7RM at 3300 (mv) fps at 600 yards and the 143HH. It was right at 1/2 moa (3" groups) and accurate to the advertised bc at 7000 feet. I took my first deer with it and it was effective to say the least. I don't think I have enough twist to run the 170 class HH however. Mine is 8.5 twist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
143 Hammer Hunter vs 169 Hammer Hunter
Top