Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
140 vs 147 ELD-M
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Outlaw6.0" data-source="post: 2693142" data-attributes="member: 23486"><p>I voted 140 just because of the limited capacity of the Creed'. As far as I'm concerned, it's a win-win situation. The 140 can be driven faster while still offering very a very good ballistic coefficient & high sectional density. </p><p></p><p>For whatever reason (probably because i'm weird), I have never been a fan of the 147, in any cartridge. It seemed to me as a solution looking for a problem... maybe <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" data-shortname=":rofl:" />.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>t</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Outlaw6.0, post: 2693142, member: 23486"] I voted 140 just because of the limited capacity of the Creed'. As far as I'm concerned, it's a win-win situation. The 140 can be driven faster while still offering very a very good ballistic coefficient & high sectional density. For whatever reason (probably because i'm weird), I have never been a fan of the 147, in any cartridge. It seemed to me as a solution looking for a problem... maybe 🤣. t [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
140 vs 147 ELD-M
Top