Recent content by Sub MOA Hunter

Sorry should have said Im using ADI 2213SC (equivalent to H4831), ADI manual says 55.5 max for 175gn projectile in 24" barrel is 2651fps, im 180gr 56.5gn and getting 2640fps with 26" barrel (is my crony out!!!) Be nice to be getting another 100fps or am I just being to cautious on pressure...

Hi Team I have a custom Built Dan Hardy 280AI Long Range Rig with 26" 1:8 Barrel Im Shooting 180 Berger's using 56.5gn of ADI powder and only getting 2640ft if I go to 57gn and the primer is starting to crown as it flows into the firering pin although the primers are still slightly rounded...

Hi Team I have a custom Built Dan Hardy 280AI Long Range Rig with 26" 1:8 Barrel suppressed, Im Shooting 180 Berger's using 56.5gn of ADI powder and only getting 2640ft if I go to 57gn and the primer is starting to crown as it flows into the firering pin although the primers are still...

Thanks to all those who replied big help, happy shooting

Am building a 280AI 26 to 28'' barrel for long range 400m to 1000m hunting (varments/deer) but also want to have the option of LR target shooting I have run some data through my ballistics program 180gr Ber VLD mv 2820fps and 162gr Amax mv 3000fps, 180gr show it drops 86cm more but has 3.5cm...

By the way, I run 180 VLDs in my 1/8 twist 280 AI with Nosler Brass and CCI BR2 primers. With 56.5 grains of RL22. It is a tack driver. I shot that particular rifle at the ASC newshooter match a few weeks ago and made hit out to 1122. I am gettin unusually good numbers. 2860 fps with the dope I...

I agree with you Scot E

Agreed

Everyone is entitled to their opinion so here is mine I have owned and am familiar with both systems for LR shooting but Mil-rad wins my vote without a doubt In NZ, Aus we use the metric system so I think those who say MOA is easier is because they have not had the time to understand Milrad...