Very amazing, the 6.5 Sin would be. Asuming 140 gr. Berger at 3400 ft/sec
At 5000 ft elevation it whips my 338 Edge with 300 SMK @ MV 2832 ft/sec
in the following departments using G7 BC on both:
In the supersonic department by 175 yards for a total distance of 2225 yards!
In the vertical department beats it by 7.3 MOA (6.4 feet) at 1000 yards only needing 16.1 MOA
Wow, it would even whip it in the wind department by 0.4 MOA (just over 4 inches) only needing 3.6 MOA on a 10 mph wind at 1000 yards
Eaglet is going crazy.... remember the wind is 10 mph and now we take spin drift in the equation:
Note: 6.5mm with a twist of 8:1 RT and the Edge with a twist of 10:1 RT
When the wind is coming from Left to Right
6.5mm needs adjustment of: 4.1 moa
Edge needs Adjustment of: 4.7 moa
When the wind is coming from Right to Left
6.5mm needs adjustment of: 3.1 moa
Edge needs Adjustment of: 3.3 moa
The reason, (it puzzles me), is because the big bullet is being affected more by the spin drift.
Spin drift alone for the little bullet it moves to the right 4.9" and the big bullet 7.2"
In the time department, the big bullet gets there only 0.2 sec. slower, not bad for a big mama
WE all know who the winner is in kinetic energy all the way from 0 yards to 3000 yards...
At 1500 yards the little bullet will have a retained velocity of 1700 ft/sec and an energy of 902 ft-lbs.
Most will disagree with this personal opinion but I belive that because of the extremely high SD (Sectional Density)
of the 6.5mm 140 gr. bullet it's capable to take Elk at that range with a well placed shot. I know the penetration
will be more impresive than most folks will ever think.
Buttom line, if Mr. Sinner gives us a dicount after the first barrel,
I think I'll be getting one... geargrinder, did you hear that?
And look at this... If you zero a 745 yards using the Night Force NP-R2 reticle, (2 moa spacing), using the top most line you'll be zero a 100 yards and then...
That's a long way to be shooting without making any turret adjustments...