New bullet maker that looks interesting
- Thread starter slickyboyboo
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
- Status
Your meaning "no harm or disrespect" is completely disingenuous. You find disagreement, something doesn't suite your fancy, and then attack. Completely disingenuous.
W3P is overestimating [accidentally or not (inflated)] these BCs. That's the feature of the W3P bullet that initially captured the topic of this Thread. Only W3P can decide what to do about that, because they're values that he's publishing. If you're still posting on this thread after that fact is widely acknowledged (Lord help me), then you'll be the one run out of plausible arguments. Of course, there's always drivel...
"I'll buy when it's proven" is something you've implied. Never my statement. I shoot some of these style bullets now in .308 and they're an excellent long range bullet. My statements are the BCs are overestimated, and; consumers will not become customers thru intimidation, coercion, peer pressure, or internet potshots, such as yours.
The only thing you've brought to this discussion is your Pom Poms, armchair philosophy, and the disrespect - which according to your follow-up statement - you don't really mean.
Your Posts were the first brought to this thread that are completely frivolous. You never had anything to say on topic in the first place, let alone running out. You're simply part of the Pom Pom squad - and obviously quite proud of it. When all the tassels have fallen off your Pom Poms, I expect your arms will remain in motion.
barnesuser28
Well-Known Member
Gotta love bullet threads!! Haha
D
Deleted member 46119
Guest
I don't know where to go with that.
IMO you've dug you hole and I no longer need to hand you a shovel.
Let me tell you. Just go away. Tee hee...
Michael Eichele
Well-Known Member
They've all ended the same way. I'm sure this one will be no different. Lots of feathers ruffled on both ends and many between, threads getting closed and members (including the manufacture/representatives) getting banned. This threads off to a slower start than the others but definately pointed in the same direction. phorwath has endured at least two that I can remember. Him and I have argued somewhat bitterly in the past too. I would have to concede and say that much of what we argued about, he was in the right. Some views we still don't share but those are more preferences and opinions versus facts. Mostly when it came down to ballistic coefficient, something that I have a much better understand of today. Not because of what other people say, but because I've come to know a little something about physics, math and realizing that mistakes were made in my previous BC testing.
The super BC debate horse on this site has been beaten to death over and over and over again and then the dead horses have been beaten some more. Guys like phorwath have contributed greatly to this site. He is actually one of the more 'real' long range guys here. Most guys here could learn a lot from him. His knowledge and experience truly puts him in the upper tier. How he controls a trigger I can't vouch for but his knowledge and understating is as spot on as it gets.
Just understand that there have been 'new bullet makers' here that didn't last as members here long enough for anybody to get their hands on their bullets to work up any BCs, mainly because of their argumentative and condescending behavior.
Really? This is the plan for promoting your bullets?
Whiskey 3 Precision
Well-Known Member
What will be...will be Michael, unlike what you speak of above we have our bullets in thread members hands.
That offer we accepted from you is still good is it not? We are awaiting your 600 yard results and figures. Keep us all posted....
And thank you for your contributions.....
Michael Eichele
Well-Known Member
My offer indeed does stand. My previous post was just a long winded way of saying that everybody needs to chill a bit.
M
- Status
