Cost of a Custom Rifle with Glass

To my way of thinking, I spend well over $4k/year on ammo for my bolt guns, and I don't even want to know how much time shooting and dry firing. A $4k scope isn't expensive in the long haul if you're actually getting out there and using it. To each their own of courseI
 
The last 40 years of improvements in the bullets, Optics, and rifle components, have all contributed to add another 400 - 500 yards on the far end of a make able long distance shot. Just better days for all hunters.

No doubt, it's a lot easier…..for we novices! 😉 But, in the right hands…..some of the old stuff can work. And without a scope! 🤔memtb

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/843705/posts
 
The good news is scopes are easily added to the rifle after you have it built. My way of thinking is spend the money to get the best action possible for your purposes. It is the heart of your rifle and should last a lifetime. Stocks can be changed relatively easily, but are critical to the fit and feel of the rifle. Barrels are consumable, but probably are the most important component for achieving desired accuracy. Triggers are right up there in importance, but I personally could not discern the difference between a special and a diamond in a hunting appropriate weight. Based on my lack of skill or experience in the area of gunsmith work, I believe selecting a high quality GS is also one of the most important things to consider when going full custom.
 
Have you tried March?
No. I don't care much for their reticle selection. Up until the release of the 4.5-28 High Master, I wasn't interested in their reputation of shallow depth of field/finicky parallax and tight eyebox. The small amount that I've looked into them more recently I've found that they tend to sit longer on the secondary market and not hold value very well. All those things combined have kept me away.

I'm sure they have a design somewhere in the pipeline that I'll end up grabbing, but nothing currently that interests me.
 
No. I don't care much for their reticle selection. Up until the release of the 4.5-28 High Master, I wasn't interested in their reputation of shallow depth of field/finicky parallax and tight eyebox. The small amount that I've looked into them more recently I've found that they tend to sit longer on the secondary market and not hold value very well. All those things combined have kept me away.

I'm sure they have a design somewhere in the pipeline that I'll end up grabbing, but nothing currently that interests me.
Good to know, thanks!
 
Top