Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Zeiss Victory 2500 vs Leica Geovid 3000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="223dude" data-source="post: 1534105" data-attributes="member: 12156"><p>I have owned a HD-B 2200 10x42 and a Swarovski 10x42 range.</p><p>I was not happy with ether of them & sold them.</p><p>So I broke down and bought the new zeiss 10x42 rf</p><p>last week.</p><p></p><p>I'v have not had them long</p><p>but at this stage of my tests</p><p>here is what i found.</p><p></p><p>The glass-</p><p>Its vary good, the sweet spot is about 85%</p><p>there are bright .The light transfer is about 88%</p><p>I would say the glass is 10% better then the hd-b or Swaro's to my eyes.</p><p></p><p>The size-</p><p>There small for rf bino's about</p><p>the size of regular 10x42.</p><p>The body has a good rubber armor</p><p>on them is better then the hd-b but not as good as the Swaro's.</p><p>The wight is 32.5oz about the same as the hd-b.</p><p>They feel rely good in the my hand.</p><p>They also range on release witch</p><p>Is no accurate/ more steady.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The range finder -</p><p>Its the best i'v used in a rf bino so fare.</p><p>I can ping a elk at 2000 yrds</p><p>100% of the time. At 2400 yrds is about</p><p>as fare as i can reliably hit trees.</p><p>The circle is a little bigger the i would like</p><p>to be but smaller then the Swaro's.</p><p>I do think the New hd-b 3000 will have</p><p>a better range finder then the Zeiss rf.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The ballistic calculator-</p><p>Is the one thing i can't speak to much</p><p>as i have not had time to play with it to much</p><p>but so far i'm liking it.</p><p></p><p>I like them so far</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="223dude, post: 1534105, member: 12156"] I have owned a HD-B 2200 10x42 and a Swarovski 10x42 range. I was not happy with ether of them & sold them. So I broke down and bought the new zeiss 10x42 rf last week. I'v have not had them long but at this stage of my tests here is what i found. The glass- Its vary good, the sweet spot is about 85% there are bright .The light transfer is about 88% I would say the glass is 10% better then the hd-b or Swaro's to my eyes. The size- There small for rf bino's about the size of regular 10x42. The body has a good rubber armor on them is better then the hd-b but not as good as the Swaro's. The wight is 32.5oz about the same as the hd-b. They feel rely good in the my hand. They also range on release witch Is no accurate/ more steady. The range finder - Its the best i'v used in a rf bino so fare. I can ping a elk at 2000 yrds 100% of the time. At 2400 yrds is about as fare as i can reliably hit trees. The circle is a little bigger the i would like to be but smaller then the Swaro's. I do think the New hd-b 3000 will have a better range finder then the Zeiss rf. The ballistic calculator- Is the one thing i can't speak to much as i have not had time to play with it to much but so far i'm liking it. I like them so far [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Zeiss Victory 2500 vs Leica Geovid 3000
Top