Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
YOU COULD BE NEXT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LB" data-source="post: 77997" data-attributes="member: 2721"><p>Yes, but a byproduct of these policies is that rural people, people that work the night shift and their commute to work is just about the only driving they do in the course of the day; these people are effectively disarmed, as they leave the house. That is the real consequence, a blanket company policy has practically disarmed an entire county, except for their bedroom closet.</p><p></p><p>Besides that, I am opposed to unilateral policy decisions, without input from the workers. The management is not concerned about employee safety. They are worried about law suits and insurance premiums; dollars and cents. This is a misguided employee welfare issue. And, it will come down to what the previous writer has suggested.</p><p></p><p>Yes, some people will buy into the idea that it is for their own good, rather than exposing it as an infringement of their personal freedom.</p><p></p><p>With that victory and the backing of a few shortsighted but well meaning pinheads, they will fire the smokers, the spouses of smokers, then hunters and owners of black guns, and those that have "LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINES". Then it's Saturday night specials and what Barbara Boxer calls "junk guns". Soon, spouses of hunters, come under suspicion, as well......... We may neeed to conduct surprise searches of employee's homes to be sure they are in compliance? </p><p></p><p><strong>get it?</strong></p><p></p><p>Does the opposition ever yield concessions? Yeah, right. It is all incremental, one small victory after another and the next thing you know, you will be armed with squirt guns. And, some people are sure to feel threatened by squirt guns. Which means that something must be done; even if it's wrong. There is no getting around an irrational gun phobia, short of an outright, complete and total ban on firearms. Japan and England come to mind.</p><p></p><p>Do not give an inch.</p><p></p><p>Good hunting. LB</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LB, post: 77997, member: 2721"] Yes, but a byproduct of these policies is that rural people, people that work the night shift and their commute to work is just about the only driving they do in the course of the day; these people are effectively disarmed, as they leave the house. That is the real consequence, a blanket company policy has practically disarmed an entire county, except for their bedroom closet. Besides that, I am opposed to unilateral policy decisions, without input from the workers. The management is not concerned about employee safety. They are worried about law suits and insurance premiums; dollars and cents. This is a misguided employee welfare issue. And, it will come down to what the previous writer has suggested. Yes, some people will buy into the idea that it is for their own good, rather than exposing it as an infringement of their personal freedom. With that victory and the backing of a few shortsighted but well meaning pinheads, they will fire the smokers, the spouses of smokers, then hunters and owners of black guns, and those that have "LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINES". Then it's Saturday night specials and what Barbara Boxer calls "junk guns". Soon, spouses of hunters, come under suspicion, as well......... We may neeed to conduct surprise searches of employee's homes to be sure they are in compliance? [b]get it?[/b] Does the opposition ever yield concessions? Yeah, right. It is all incremental, one small victory after another and the next thing you know, you will be armed with squirt guns. And, some people are sure to feel threatened by squirt guns. Which means that something must be done; even if it's wrong. There is no getting around an irrational gun phobia, short of an outright, complete and total ban on firearms. Japan and England come to mind. Do not give an inch. Good hunting. LB [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
YOU COULD BE NEXT
Top