Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
YOU COULD BE NEXT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LB" data-source="post: 77940" data-attributes="member: 2721"><p>This is not a flame, sasquatch. I read the linked article, don't know if you did, or know anything about what happened? Basically, it looks like what the fired employees did was legal, but it may have been against company policy? The part that is not explained is how the company came to know that there was a violation of policy? Did they conduct searches and seizures, a violation of the Bill of Rights, but consistant with company policy? </p><p></p><p>Is company policy the law of the land; are strip searches next? Maybe gun towers....just in case?</p><p></p><p>It seems to me that a private vehicle, lacking what the police call "probable cause" should be protected from groundless searches. Or, if there was some sort of evidence, then the matter should have been handled by LE under the authority of a search warrant.</p><p></p><p>I'd like to think that I do not surrender my Constitutional Rights in order to be employed by this Facist Conglomerate.</p><p></p><p>Good hunting. LB</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LB, post: 77940, member: 2721"] This is not a flame, sasquatch. I read the linked article, don't know if you did, or know anything about what happened? Basically, it looks like what the fired employees did was legal, but it may have been against company policy? The part that is not explained is how the company came to know that there was a violation of policy? Did they conduct searches and seizures, a violation of the Bill of Rights, but consistant with company policy? Is company policy the law of the land; are strip searches next? Maybe gun towers....just in case? It seems to me that a private vehicle, lacking what the police call "probable cause" should be protected from groundless searches. Or, if there was some sort of evidence, then the matter should have been handled by LE under the authority of a search warrant. I'd like to think that I do not surrender my Constitutional Rights in order to be employed by this Facist Conglomerate. Good hunting. LB [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
YOU COULD BE NEXT
Top