Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
www.live-shot.com
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest" data-source="post: 63620"><p><strong>Re: <a href="http://www.live-shot.com" target="_blank">www.live-shot.com</a></strong></p><p></p><p>Pete, I must tell you that you did exactly what the anti-hunter &amp; anti-gun groups do - you had a point and you mixed it up with propaganda and now the point you have is not even discussed. Whether or not it has merit!</p><p></p><p>I think that killing an animal over the internet is not hunting. Not even close. Its slaughter. Handicaped hunters have opportunity available to them and do not have to resort to the internet hunt. I think we as hunters have an obligation to keep our sport and those who participate in it on the right page or the anti's will eat us up.</p><p></p><p>With regards to matchkings or other match bullets on game, why comment in your post?</p><p>You are only going to start a heated thread and that is all that anyone will talk about. The match vs. hunting bullet debate is a dead horse on this site....no matter what side you are on. Your discussion of the internet hunt will never get off the ground.</p><p></p><p>I think you should remove the match bullet section of your post and start fresh with the topic of the internet hunt. I'm not saying your position with regards to bullets is right or wrong but rather that it is going to take away from your main point - internet hunting.</p><p></p><p>I also want add that Len has a "no ethics discussion" policy on this site because he wants to discuss topics related to LRH and we all have our own personal code of ethics.</p><p></p><p>I thought the topic of internet hunting was so far over the line that I do not consider it hunting and with that mindset I commented. I also think that these practices will cover us all with paint from the brush of the anti's.</p><p></p><p>Len, again I considered this general ethics and not personal ethics so I commented. Also, I'm wearing OD green socks so I figured it was ok. If I am wrong I apolgize....I'll put on different socks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest, post: 63620"] [b]Re: [url]www.live-shot.com[/url][/b] Pete, I must tell you that you did exactly what the anti-hunter & anti-gun groups do - you had a point and you mixed it up with propaganda and now the point you have is not even discussed. Whether or not it has merit! I think that killing an animal over the internet is not hunting. Not even close. Its slaughter. Handicaped hunters have opportunity available to them and do not have to resort to the internet hunt. I think we as hunters have an obligation to keep our sport and those who participate in it on the right page or the anti's will eat us up. With regards to matchkings or other match bullets on game, why comment in your post? You are only going to start a heated thread and that is all that anyone will talk about. The match vs. hunting bullet debate is a dead horse on this site....no matter what side you are on. Your discussion of the internet hunt will never get off the ground. I think you should remove the match bullet section of your post and start fresh with the topic of the internet hunt. I'm not saying your position with regards to bullets is right or wrong but rather that it is going to take away from your main point - internet hunting. I also want add that Len has a "no ethics discussion" policy on this site because he wants to discuss topics related to LRH and we all have our own personal code of ethics. I thought the topic of internet hunting was so far over the line that I do not consider it hunting and with that mindset I commented. I also think that these practices will cover us all with paint from the brush of the anti's. Len, again I considered this general ethics and not personal ethics so I commented. Also, I'm wearing OD green socks so I figured it was ok. If I am wrong I apolgize....I'll put on different socks! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
www.live-shot.com
Top