Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Wildcats vs Traditional Cartridges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GLTaylor" data-source="post: 1856335" data-attributes="member: 111593"><p>Well stated JE Custom and others.</p><p>Thank God for wildcatters. Once in a while they hit a real home run. I also used to form 6ppc from .220 Russian cases in the 70's. Today the 6PPC holds virtually every short range BR record. Remington made their 6BR to try to compete. It can't keep up with the ppc, but has found it's home in some variation at the 600 and 1000 yd line. I think somebody mentioned the host of cartridges we have today that started out as somebody's "what if i" cartridge.</p><p>They're Fun to tinker with!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GLTaylor, post: 1856335, member: 111593"] Well stated JE Custom and others. Thank God for wildcatters. Once in a while they hit a real home run. I also used to form 6ppc from .220 Russian cases in the 70's. Today the 6PPC holds virtually every short range BR record. Remington made their 6BR to try to compete. It can't keep up with the ppc, but has found it's home in some variation at the 600 and 1000 yd line. I think somebody mentioned the host of cartridges we have today that started out as somebody's "what if i" cartridge. They're Fun to tinker with! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Wildcats vs Traditional Cartridges
Top