Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Wilcat Bullets...Why haven't BC's been posted?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bailey1474" data-source="post: 76566" data-attributes="member: 3249"><p><strong>Re: Wilcat Bullets...Why haven\'t BC\'s been posted?</strong></p><p></p><p>abinok,</p><p></p><p>Maybe I'm stupid, but I just don't see how testing the bullets with the proper equipment could yeild any different results than backwards engineering them. </p><p></p><p>As it has been stated many times, some of the major bullet manufacturors fib on their bcs. These have supposedly been tested the proper way. If your going to use them in real world setting, your going to have to adjust your drop chart to work for your conditions. This will almost always result in using a different bc than printed in a book.</p><p></p><p>On a side note: I hope this squabble doesn't run anyone off. I don't think this subject would be the only one some of us would argue about. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how wrong it may seem us. Despite having and opposite stand on this issue, everyone involved in this discussion (or rant) has something to offer. So let's all just agree to disagree /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif and try not to pick any fights. John M. knew exactly where this would go when he started it /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif and I fell into the trap. I appologize for the inappropriate comments.</p><p></p><p>Good evening,</p><p>B.J.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bailey1474, post: 76566, member: 3249"] [b]Re: Wilcat Bullets...Why haven\'t BC\'s been posted?[/b] abinok, Maybe I'm stupid, but I just don't see how testing the bullets with the proper equipment could yeild any different results than backwards engineering them. As it has been stated many times, some of the major bullet manufacturors fib on their bcs. These have supposedly been tested the proper way. If your going to use them in real world setting, your going to have to adjust your drop chart to work for your conditions. This will almost always result in using a different bc than printed in a book. On a side note: I hope this squabble doesn't run anyone off. I don't think this subject would be the only one some of us would argue about. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how wrong it may seem us. Despite having and opposite stand on this issue, everyone involved in this discussion (or rant) has something to offer. So let's all just agree to disagree [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] and try not to pick any fights. John M. knew exactly where this would go when he started it [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] and I fell into the trap. I appologize for the inappropriate comments. Good evening, B.J. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Wilcat Bullets...Why haven't BC's been posted?
Top