Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why use a carbon wrapped barel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UniqueUserName" data-source="post: 2071197" data-attributes="member: 92845"><p>I don't believe that I have ever seen so many irrelevant strawman arguments packed into a single post ever. It's a ploy people use when they can't argue the real point.</p><p></p><div style="margin-left: 20px">I never said that CF doesn't make things lighter (not in terms of motorcycles, not in terms of barrels, not in terms of firearms)</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">I never claimed that CF was not "monumental"</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">I never even mentioned Glocks or that plastics or CF was inferior or Grands were better than M16s for that matter</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">I never mentioned cold bore accuracy or any reference to accuracy, range, "transgenic instability"</div> <div style="margin-left: 20px">I haven't even said anything negative about CF wrapped barrels (I own a hunting rifle with one and am more than happy with it)</div><p></p><p>You can argue against all of these points that nobody has made as long as you like, but none of them have any relevance to what you've been challenged on.</p><p></p><p>I, along with others, have challenged you specifically on your claims regarding the rate of cooling. You've failed, spectacularly, to substantiate those claims. You make analogies to toilet paper rolls and vague, obscure references to some 30-year-old, classified study that I'm not convinced that you have even read, much less comprehended in the context of thermal performance. But you never address the actual physics of it directly or cite anything remotely verifiable.</p><p></p><p>Let's stick to the point of the debate, can you substantiate your claims about improved cooling of CF wrapped barrels, based on the established concepts of heat-transfer or not?</p><p></p><p>No more strawman arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UniqueUserName, post: 2071197, member: 92845"] I don't believe that I have ever seen so many irrelevant strawman arguments packed into a single post ever. It's a ploy people use when they can't argue the real point. [INDENT]I never said that CF doesn't make things lighter (not in terms of motorcycles, not in terms of barrels, not in terms of firearms)[/INDENT] [INDENT]I never claimed that CF was not "monumental"[/INDENT] [INDENT]I never even mentioned Glocks or that plastics or CF was inferior or Grands were better than M16s for that matter[/INDENT] [INDENT]I never mentioned cold bore accuracy or any reference to accuracy, range, "transgenic instability"[/INDENT] [INDENT]I haven't even said anything negative about CF wrapped barrels (I own a hunting rifle with one and am more than happy with it)[/INDENT] You can argue against all of these points that nobody has made as long as you like, but none of them have any relevance to what you've been challenged on. I, along with others, have challenged you specifically on your claims regarding the rate of cooling. You've failed, spectacularly, to substantiate those claims. You make analogies to toilet paper rolls and vague, obscure references to some 30-year-old, classified study that I'm not convinced that you have even read, much less comprehended in the context of thermal performance. But you never address the actual physics of it directly or cite anything remotely verifiable. Let's stick to the point of the debate, can you substantiate your claims about improved cooling of CF wrapped barrels, based on the established concepts of heat-transfer or not? No more strawman arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why use a carbon wrapped barel?
Top