Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why use a carbon wrapped barel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bdyal1972" data-source="post: 2071147" data-attributes="member: 50039"><p>I am ONLY reporting what the largest MOST ACCURATE metrology lab IN THE WORLD DECIDED ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO!!!</p><p></p><p>BEFORE</p><p></p><p>99% OF YOU HAD TOUCHED OR KNEW WHAT CARBON FIBER WAS..... OR USED..... OR KNEW HOW IT WORKED....</p><p></p><p>FOR ME IT JUST MEANT 10 YEARS LATER I COULD HAVE A 300 WIN MAG 10LB TOTAL WEIGHT MARK 248 MOD 1 REPLICA IN THE WOODS WHERE MY ISSUE M24 IN PRE MARK 248 WAS 18 LBS LEAVING THE WIRE....</p><p></p><p>AND 1/2 MOA AT 1000 YARDS AT 10LBS VS 1MOA AT 1000YARDS AT 18LBS....</p><p></p><p>CF TECHNOLOGY LOWERED THE WEIGHT OF A TITAIUM ALUMINUM MAGNESIUM YZ 250 FROM 235LBS TO 155LBS IN 1997!!!</p><p></p><p>CF IS MONUMENTAL</p><p></p><p>IN MAKING M4S WORK BETTER IN E&E AS WELL....</p><p></p><p>POINT PROVEN BACK IN 1992-1995 IN MULTIPLE PLACES AND TIMES</p><p></p><p>ASK AROUND TO GUYS WHOS LIVES DEPEND ON TRIGGER PULLING....</p><p></p><p>IT WORKS AND HAS ALMOST 30 YEARS....</p><p></p><p>I KEEP HEARING ARGUEMENTS SIMILAR TO ANTI TUPPERWARE GLOCKS IN 80S</p><p></p><p>AND</p><p></p><p>ANTI M16 VS GARAND GUYS IN 70S</p><p></p><p>PIC OUT 2 IDENTICAL PROFILE BARRELS</p><p></p><p>PUT THEM ON A SEMIAUTO</p><p></p><p>SHOOT THE CRAP OUT OF THEM SCIENTIFICALLY</p><p></p><p>Which barrel lasted longer moa?</p><p></p><p>Which barrel had a consistent cold bore shot Longer?</p><p></p><p>Which barrel had a longer distance to transgenic instability?????</p><p></p><p>You can not accept THE TRUTH AS LONG AS YOU WANT</p><p></p><p>BUT</p><p></p><p>IT WAS TESTED FACT ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO</p><p></p><p>You are trying to DISPROVE FACT WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE-ABILITY-DEPTH NOR TESTING FACILITIES....</p><p></p><p>GOOD LICK PILGRIMS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bdyal1972, post: 2071147, member: 50039"] I am ONLY reporting what the largest MOST ACCURATE metrology lab IN THE WORLD DECIDED ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO!!! BEFORE 99% OF YOU HAD TOUCHED OR KNEW WHAT CARBON FIBER WAS..... OR USED..... OR KNEW HOW IT WORKED.... FOR ME IT JUST MEANT 10 YEARS LATER I COULD HAVE A 300 WIN MAG 10LB TOTAL WEIGHT MARK 248 MOD 1 REPLICA IN THE WOODS WHERE MY ISSUE M24 IN PRE MARK 248 WAS 18 LBS LEAVING THE WIRE.... AND 1/2 MOA AT 1000 YARDS AT 10LBS VS 1MOA AT 1000YARDS AT 18LBS.... CF TECHNOLOGY LOWERED THE WEIGHT OF A TITAIUM ALUMINUM MAGNESIUM YZ 250 FROM 235LBS TO 155LBS IN 1997!!! CF IS MONUMENTAL IN MAKING M4S WORK BETTER IN E&E AS WELL.... POINT PROVEN BACK IN 1992-1995 IN MULTIPLE PLACES AND TIMES ASK AROUND TO GUYS WHOS LIVES DEPEND ON TRIGGER PULLING.... IT WORKS AND HAS ALMOST 30 YEARS.... I KEEP HEARING ARGUEMENTS SIMILAR TO ANTI TUPPERWARE GLOCKS IN 80S AND ANTI M16 VS GARAND GUYS IN 70S PIC OUT 2 IDENTICAL PROFILE BARRELS PUT THEM ON A SEMIAUTO SHOOT THE CRAP OUT OF THEM SCIENTIFICALLY Which barrel lasted longer moa? Which barrel had a consistent cold bore shot Longer? Which barrel had a longer distance to transgenic instability????? You can not accept THE TRUTH AS LONG AS YOU WANT BUT IT WAS TESTED FACT ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO You are trying to DISPROVE FACT WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE-ABILITY-DEPTH NOR TESTING FACILITIES.... GOOD LICK PILGRIMS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why use a carbon wrapped barel?
Top