Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
why such a large difference in data between sources
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RogerPA" data-source="post: 2382627" data-attributes="member: 70741"><p>The Barnes XLC was a coated bullet that reduced barrel friction to the extent Barnes load data for this bullet was always different (higher max volumes) than that for their original X-bullet. Barnes discontinued this bullet with the introduction of their Triple Shock line. The coating generated fouling, amongst some other problems. I would disregard load data for this bullet when comparing it to others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RogerPA, post: 2382627, member: 70741"] The Barnes XLC was a coated bullet that reduced barrel friction to the extent Barnes load data for this bullet was always different (higher max volumes) than that for their original X-bullet. Barnes discontinued this bullet with the introduction of their Triple Shock line. The coating generated fouling, amongst some other problems. I would disregard load data for this bullet when comparing it to others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
why such a large difference in data between sources
Top