Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why no 270-08 ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Long Time Reader" data-source="post: 838865" data-attributes="member: 69671"><p>Dim its virtue??? Ballistically inferior??? We are talking about creating a <strong>new</strong> cartridge using a .277 diameter bullet - the same has been done with the .243, .257, .264, .284, <strong>.285 ( yes, the .285 came before the .284 Why did Americans have to mess with the 7mm and dim its virtue and make an inferior cartridge), </strong>.308 etc... etc...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Long Time Reader, post: 838865, member: 69671"] Dim its virtue??? Ballistically inferior??? We are talking about creating a [B]new[/B] cartridge using a .277 diameter bullet - the same has been done with the .243, .257, .264, .284, [B].285 ( yes, the .285 came before the .284 Why did Americans have to mess with the 7mm and dim its virtue and make an inferior cartridge), [/B].308 etc... etc... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why no 270-08 ?
Top