Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Why does MY 300PRC hate H1000?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Monteria" data-source="post: 2780046" data-attributes="member: 115565"><p>The H1000 case fill is pretty much exactly what I would strive for. I have tested WLRM, CCI250, and F215M. All tests were done with identical components behind 7828 as a control, and the results were always 7828 being a clear winner. </p><p></p><p>I too wonder about other factors in consistency of ignition and I am considering a set of mandrels to test. Besides primers and tension, what other factors in ignition am I not considering? Is H1000 generally picky about ignition factors?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Monteria, post: 2780046, member: 115565"] The H1000 case fill is pretty much exactly what I would strive for. I have tested WLRM, CCI250, and F215M. All tests were done with identical components behind 7828 as a control, and the results were always 7828 being a clear winner. I too wonder about other factors in consistency of ignition and I am considering a set of mandrels to test. Besides primers and tension, what other factors in ignition am I not considering? Is H1000 generally picky about ignition factors? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Why does MY 300PRC hate H1000?
Top