Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Which ballistic software is right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 414104" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>I too have tried several including the LB3.0. I am now back to using the exbal (Nightforce) program. It <strong><em>simply</em></strong> works best for me for my first round hits. </p><p> </p><p>I know what my rifle does for spin drift, and I don't feel I can read the wind perfectly enough to where the Coriolis affect is worth my time. I truely feel some see wind affects and call them coriolis. In fact I feel when you factor in human error, and the accuracy of the rifle, accuracy of ammo, coriolis is hardly something we can consistantly see in our equation. </p><p> </p><p>Some use it and sware by it. But my advice is use the NF program, tweek the tradjectory validations till you are on at 700 and 1100 and go for it. Spend more time learning to read the wind and practicing. This time spent will pay off more than playing with complex programs at your computer desk.</p><p> </p><p>JMO</p><p> </p><p>Jeff gun)gun)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 414104, member: 7503"] I too have tried several including the LB3.0. I am now back to using the exbal (Nightforce) program. It [B][I]simply[/I][/B] works best for me for my first round hits. I know what my rifle does for spin drift, and I don't feel I can read the wind perfectly enough to where the Coriolis affect is worth my time. I truely feel some see wind affects and call them coriolis. In fact I feel when you factor in human error, and the accuracy of the rifle, accuracy of ammo, coriolis is hardly something we can consistantly see in our equation. Some use it and sware by it. But my advice is use the NF program, tweek the tradjectory validations till you are on at 700 and 1100 and go for it. Spend more time learning to read the wind and practicing. This time spent will pay off more than playing with complex programs at your computer desk. JMO Jeff gun)gun) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Which ballistic software is right?
Top