Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
which annealer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2560740" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>All their research is posted on their website. It's up to you to decide if you want to believe it or not. There are also examples of home built induction annealers that work off the same principle and produce similar results for a lower cost if someone wants to build it on their own. Personally the lack of an open flame, lack of a pot of molten salt, lack of any setup time, lack of any calibration required, lack of a fuel source requirement, and ease of switching between cartridges made it easy for me to decide to buy an AMP.</p><p></p><p>One method or machine isn't necessarily "better" than another, it's a different mousetrap with different benefits and drawbacks.</p><p></p><p>Same logic as deciding which scope (which cost 3-5x more than an AMP) you want. Reticle, magnification, internal adjustment, glass, etc. The only way "better" enters is based on the goal set of the end user, which obviously varies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2560740, member: 116181"] All their research is posted on their website. It's up to you to decide if you want to believe it or not. There are also examples of home built induction annealers that work off the same principle and produce similar results for a lower cost if someone wants to build it on their own. Personally the lack of an open flame, lack of a pot of molten salt, lack of any setup time, lack of any calibration required, lack of a fuel source requirement, and ease of switching between cartridges made it easy for me to decide to buy an AMP. One method or machine isn't necessarily "better" than another, it's a different mousetrap with different benefits and drawbacks. Same logic as deciding which scope (which cost 3-5x more than an AMP) you want. Reticle, magnification, internal adjustment, glass, etc. The only way "better" enters is based on the goal set of the end user, which obviously varies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
which annealer?
Top