Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Where isn't an ill. ret. legal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Topgun 30-06" data-source="post: 458301" data-attributes="member: 28854"><p><img src="http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/mca2009.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p><img src="http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/menu.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p> </p><p><strong>87-3-134. Restriction on use of electronic motion-tracking device while hunting. </strong>It is unlawful for a person, while hunting, to possess any electronic motion-tracking device or mechanism, as defined by commission rule, that is designed to track the motion of a game animal and relay information on the animal's movement to the hunter. A radio-tracking collar attached to a dog that is used by a hunter engaged in lawful hunting activities is not considered a motion-tracking device or mechanism for purposes of this section. </p><p>[SIZE=-1]<strong>History:</strong> En. Sec. 1, Ch. 366, L. 1999. [/SIZE]</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>*This is the section they are using to enforce the trailcam comment I made. They claim they are too advanced now and you can get instantaneous feedback to a computer and a person could be out in an area with a laptop, for example, see that one of his cams was picking up a game animal he was after, allowing him to then slip in to try and take said animal. It seems a stretch, but the way people constantly come up with ways to try and cheat on things that is why they said they did it.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Topgun 30-06, post: 458301, member: 28854"] [IMG]http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/mca2009.gif[/IMG] [IMG]http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/menu.gif[/IMG] [B]87-3-134. Restriction on use of electronic motion-tracking device while hunting. [/B]It is unlawful for a person, while hunting, to possess any electronic motion-tracking device or mechanism, as defined by commission rule, that is designed to track the motion of a game animal and relay information on the animal's movement to the hunter. A radio-tracking collar attached to a dog that is used by a hunter engaged in lawful hunting activities is not considered a motion-tracking device or mechanism for purposes of this section. [SIZE=-1][B]History:[/B] En. Sec. 1, Ch. 366, L. 1999. [/SIZE] *This is the section they are using to enforce the trailcam comment I made. They claim they are too advanced now and you can get instantaneous feedback to a computer and a person could be out in an area with a laptop, for example, see that one of his cams was picking up a game animal he was after, allowing him to then slip in to try and take said animal. It seems a stretch, but the way people constantly come up with ways to try and cheat on things that is why they said they did it. [SIZE=-1][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Where isn't an ill. ret. legal?
Top