Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
what would work best?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="6mm Remington" data-source="post: 577769" data-attributes="member: 35254"><p>I agree Ridge Runner, keep the 243 for deer hunting when you will be walking more, and do the build for the longer shots where you are posted more then hiking around. Nothing wrong with a 243 (except that it's no 6mm Remington) for deer. A lighter 85 gr. Partition, 90 gr. Accubond, or even a 100 gr. Partition would not swat back at her very much when shooting it. </p><p> </p><p>Glad to hear you guys have a handle on her diabetes. Best of luck to you guys!! Noticed you slipped on over here from the Nosler site!!</p><p> </p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="6mm Remington, post: 577769, member: 35254"] I agree Ridge Runner, keep the 243 for deer hunting when you will be walking more, and do the build for the longer shots where you are posted more then hiking around. Nothing wrong with a 243 (except that it's no 6mm Remington) for deer. A lighter 85 gr. Partition, 90 gr. Accubond, or even a 100 gr. Partition would not swat back at her very much when shooting it. Glad to hear you guys have a handle on her diabetes. Best of luck to you guys!! Noticed you slipped on over here from the Nosler site!! David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
what would work best?
Top