Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
What results with HBN or Moly coated bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Capt RB" data-source="post: 2502963" data-attributes="member: 85987"><p>Norma testing would disagree with your findings</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.accurateshooter.com/technical-articles/moly-does-it-extend-barrel-life/[/URL]</p><p> I have been using WS2/Danzac for about 5years now. I used moly off and on for the previous 20. Mostly in the 243 and 300wby. I have found that the above article is quite accurate. In my rifles that are on a WS2 diet. Dirty, they will shoot into a group and cold bore is always 1/4moa low right. Or about as good as I can shoot so meaningless. If I clean the 6.5 Creedmoor spotless like to put up for a period of time first 2-5 shots will be 1.75moa high and 1/2moa left and if I have a way to measure speed they are 50-75fps faster than my book notes. Sometimes I will get an ejector mark sometimes not. I have only shot naked bullets from factory ammo in either 6.5cm I've owned and I cannot give you enough data to be relevant for comparison.</p><p>With moly, I would see unobtainable speeds in the 243 with like components but in practice, I could shoot at the same speeds with less recoil and longer shot strings. I tested the recoil theory with the rifle on frisbees on a countertop not highly scientific but effective nonetheless.</p><p> This is a good debate and I welcome any information that counters mine because I feel I have a pretty solid background and proven examples. If I can find a better answer without coated bullets I'd switch tomorrow. Today though I will continue with my methods and expected results</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Capt RB, post: 2502963, member: 85987"] Norma testing would disagree with your findings [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.accurateshooter.com/technical-articles/moly-does-it-extend-barrel-life/[/URL] I have been using WS2/Danzac for about 5years now. I used moly off and on for the previous 20. Mostly in the 243 and 300wby. I have found that the above article is quite accurate. In my rifles that are on a WS2 diet. Dirty, they will shoot into a group and cold bore is always 1/4moa low right. Or about as good as I can shoot so meaningless. If I clean the 6.5 Creedmoor spotless like to put up for a period of time first 2-5 shots will be 1.75moa high and 1/2moa left and if I have a way to measure speed they are 50-75fps faster than my book notes. Sometimes I will get an ejector mark sometimes not. I have only shot naked bullets from factory ammo in either 6.5cm I've owned and I cannot give you enough data to be relevant for comparison. With moly, I would see unobtainable speeds in the 243 with like components but in practice, I could shoot at the same speeds with less recoil and longer shot strings. I tested the recoil theory with the rifle on frisbees on a countertop not highly scientific but effective nonetheless. This is a good debate and I welcome any information that counters mine because I feel I have a pretty solid background and proven examples. If I can find a better answer without coated bullets I'd switch tomorrow. Today though I will continue with my methods and expected results [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
What results with HBN or Moly coated bullets?
Top