Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
What bullet for elk in 300 win mag?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="winmag" data-source="post: 699091" data-attributes="member: 22166"><p>Woah.</p><p>Well I guess thats an excelent example of why folks with severe OCD issues make the best Bench/Comp guys.</p><p></p><p>Sorry if my post seemed "coarse". It was not my intention. I was simply pointing out that if powder "X" is considered temp sensitive, compared to powder "X-Extreme" then the actual difference is minimal at best, & typically the same or Very Very Simmilar corrections for poi are needed at Long Range for both brands if they're needed for one or the other.</p><p></p><p>It seems to be about as controversial a topic as Barnes vs. Berger for Terminal Performance, or .308 vs 30-06, or Ford Vs Chevy, or Stroaker vs Cummins etc.</p><p>There's two completely different schools of thought. There's NEVER a clear winner, & each side stands firm & unwavering on their idea.</p><p></p><p>It's been hashed over in the Reloading section, & Rifles, Bullets, & Ballistics section a number of times. Not necessarily in the Elk section.</p><p>While I do concede there is a difference, I hold fast to the actual difference being so slight in most common hunting cartridges, that if its effected enough to need corrections for POI, on one powder, they're virtually the same corrections needed for the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="winmag, post: 699091, member: 22166"] Woah. Well I guess thats an excelent example of why folks with severe OCD issues make the best Bench/Comp guys. Sorry if my post seemed "coarse". It was not my intention. I was simply pointing out that if powder "X" is considered temp sensitive, compared to powder "X-Extreme" then the actual difference is minimal at best, & typically the same or Very Very Simmilar corrections for poi are needed at Long Range for both brands if they're needed for one or the other. It seems to be about as controversial a topic as Barnes vs. Berger for Terminal Performance, or .308 vs 30-06, or Ford Vs Chevy, or Stroaker vs Cummins etc. There's two completely different schools of thought. There's NEVER a clear winner, & each side stands firm & unwavering on their idea. It's been hashed over in the Reloading section, & Rifles, Bullets, & Ballistics section a number of times. Not necessarily in the Elk section. While I do concede there is a difference, I hold fast to the actual difference being so slight in most common hunting cartridges, that if its effected enough to need corrections for POI, on one powder, they're virtually the same corrections needed for the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
What bullet for elk in 300 win mag?
Top