Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Deer Hunting
What bullet for 338 rum for deer hunting under 300 yards?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 115360" data-source="post: 2195450"><p>Well, since you are about the third person to incorrectly dismiss the *theory of hydrostatic shock*</p><p></p><p>Because you believe in a different *insert theory here* because you guys read a magazine headline that claimed hydrostatic shock isn't real. </p><p></p><p>Hydrostatic shock and cavitation are theories. Nobody can definitively say what happens when a bullet hits flesh. That's why they are both theories. The only portion of the hydrostatic shock theory that anyone has challenged, is to whether or not the hydraulic displacement, (that's what happens to internal fluids when something is jammed into flesh at high speed), actually shuts down the nervous system. People who actually understand this don't disregard either theory entirely. See, since every single time a bullet impacts with the flesh of a living creature, it is anecdotal. You can never re-create the effects of a bullet on flesh..... ever. If you don't believe that the hydraulic (fluid) displacement that occurs when a bullet enters flesh is a factor when determining meat loss, and therefore a real and actual factor in this ridiculous discussion where we help a guy find out which 300gr bullet that he should shoot a deer with, then you also don't understand. If you outright dismiss the hydrostatic shock theory as non-existent, then you have the wrong information. I will post a thorough explanation of the science below, but I doubt any of you will bother reading it, since you already read an article on Facebook that told you all you need to know..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 115360, post: 2195450"] Well, since you are about the third person to incorrectly dismiss the *theory of hydrostatic shock* Because you believe in a different *insert theory here* because you guys read a magazine headline that claimed hydrostatic shock isn't real. Hydrostatic shock and cavitation are theories. Nobody can definitively say what happens when a bullet hits flesh. That's why they are both theories. The only portion of the hydrostatic shock theory that anyone has challenged, is to whether or not the hydraulic displacement, (that's what happens to internal fluids when something is jammed into flesh at high speed), actually shuts down the nervous system. People who actually understand this don't disregard either theory entirely. See, since every single time a bullet impacts with the flesh of a living creature, it is anecdotal. You can never re-create the effects of a bullet on flesh..... ever. If you don't believe that the hydraulic (fluid) displacement that occurs when a bullet enters flesh is a factor when determining meat loss, and therefore a real and actual factor in this ridiculous discussion where we help a guy find out which 300gr bullet that he should shoot a deer with, then you also don't understand. If you outright dismiss the hydrostatic shock theory as non-existent, then you have the wrong information. I will post a thorough explanation of the science below, but I doubt any of you will bother reading it, since you already read an article on Facebook that told you all you need to know.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Deer Hunting
What bullet for 338 rum for deer hunting under 300 yards?
Top