Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Weight sorting brass
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 1255828" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>#1. Brass weight does not always correlate with capacity. In fact, the attributes are very different and separate.</p><p>#2. You will not know capacity matches until measuring this. So if you want matching capacities you should just measure and match them directly.</p><p>#3. Given #1, and depending on the percentage of case weight variance flagged, any actions here could be a detriment rather than benefit.</p><p></p><p>If you separate 40 out of 50 cases by weight, it could be that 4 of the 10 discarded were actual capacity matches to a mean, while 18 of the 40 kept actually depart from capacity matching. This would be a bad move on your part, as you'd have been as well off doing nothing at all.</p><p>But, you could have gathered the 26 cases out of 50 that were actually matching in capacity, -had you measured that.</p><p>So does that make brass weighing a bad shortcut? </p><p>ALL SHORTCUTS ARE BAD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 1255828, member: 1521"] #1. Brass weight does not always correlate with capacity. In fact, the attributes are very different and separate. #2. You will not know capacity matches until measuring this. So if you want matching capacities you should just measure and match them directly. #3. Given #1, and depending on the percentage of case weight variance flagged, any actions here could be a detriment rather than benefit. If you separate 40 out of 50 cases by weight, it could be that 4 of the 10 discarded were actual capacity matches to a mean, while 18 of the 40 kept actually depart from capacity matching. This would be a bad move on your part, as you'd have been as well off doing nothing at all. But, you could have gathered the 26 cases out of 50 that were actually matching in capacity, -had you measured that. So does that make brass weighing a bad shortcut? ALL SHORTCUTS ARE BAD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Weight sorting brass
Top