Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Way in or way out ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="green 788" data-source="post: 98168" data-attributes="member: 3781"><p>BH, you and others should be proud to shoot <em>consistent</em> "MOB" /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif in the real world. By "real world" I mean prone over a pack or off a bi-pod. No wind flags, no bench, no mitts or matts... 2 MOA isn't a bad <strong>average</strong> across all conditions. I cannot currently do it, and in all liklihood neither can you.</p><p></p><p>My website is geared toward helping the average shooter become better able to handload for the best possibe accuracy <em>across a variety of conditions</em>. OCW will do that better than conventional methods because the emphasis is on <em>pressure tolerant</em> load recipes--the kind you don't have to monkey with because the weather changes. </p><p></p><p>You have extolled the virtues of the traditional ladder test--so I remain amazed that you still don't understand OCW and the inherent advantages thereof. Most people get it right away... Perhaps the reason you keep misunderstanding me is related to your demonstrated tendency to skim read and miss important points--and jump to conclusions as to what the writer is saying.</p><p></p><p>Classical example above... you thought I was trying to assert that BR shooters get high runout and don't even realize it. I of course did not say that, but rather was referring to practical shooters and hunters--which is the default discipline of this website--wouldn't it be? Most guys who peruse these pages aren't BR types. Accuracy goals and necessary equipment for long range practical shooting aren't compatible or comparable with the benchrest equipment and discipline.</p><p></p><p>I am glad that you at least admitted that you don't know the "whys" behind the accuracy changes which occur when seating depth is altered. You correctly point out that one doesn't need to know why; one need only know that the principle is true. Again, that is the race driver not knowing <em>why</em> this cam duration works better--only that it does.</p><p></p><p>For my part, I will continue to study the "whys," rather than to simply say "That's just the way it is." /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif</p><p></p><p>Dan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="green 788, post: 98168, member: 3781"] BH, you and others should be proud to shoot [i]consistent[/i] "MOB" [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] in the real world. By "real world" I mean prone over a pack or off a bi-pod. No wind flags, no bench, no mitts or matts... 2 MOA isn't a bad [b]average[/b] across all conditions. I cannot currently do it, and in all liklihood neither can you. My website is geared toward helping the average shooter become better able to handload for the best possibe accuracy [i]across a variety of conditions[/i]. OCW will do that better than conventional methods because the emphasis is on [i]pressure tolerant[/i] load recipes--the kind you don't have to monkey with because the weather changes. You have extolled the virtues of the traditional ladder test--so I remain amazed that you still don't understand OCW and the inherent advantages thereof. Most people get it right away... Perhaps the reason you keep misunderstanding me is related to your demonstrated tendency to skim read and miss important points--and jump to conclusions as to what the writer is saying. Classical example above... you thought I was trying to assert that BR shooters get high runout and don't even realize it. I of course did not say that, but rather was referring to practical shooters and hunters--which is the default discipline of this website--wouldn't it be? Most guys who peruse these pages aren't BR types. Accuracy goals and necessary equipment for long range practical shooting aren't compatible or comparable with the benchrest equipment and discipline. I am glad that you at least admitted that you don't know the "whys" behind the accuracy changes which occur when seating depth is altered. You correctly point out that one doesn't need to know why; one need only know that the principle is true. Again, that is the race driver not knowing [i]why[/i] this cam duration works better--only that it does. For my part, I will continue to study the "whys," rather than to simply say "That's just the way it is." [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Dan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Way in or way out ?
Top