Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
vx-6 vs G7 vs Huskemaw
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rich Coyle" data-source="post: 1259380" data-attributes="member: 70559"><p>"I also checked into this comment on this forum and another forum.</p><p></p><p>The reason all of these scopes have supporter clubs is......THEY WORK."</p><p></p><p>Well, my Bushnells work now, but the first one sure didn't. And the repair didn't. For sure my Swarovskis z5s are all gone, but they were not the newest one. My VX-6 4-24X52 did not malfunction, but was heavier than a comparable Bushnell and its magnification range was less. The Nikon is gone because it doesn't have the hydro-phobic lens and fogged when I breathed on it in the last deer season. My Weaver V24 6-24X42, which never let me down, is for sale because I have decided to go all Bushnell to take advantage of the hydro-phobic coating. The Nightforce is gone because it was too heavy. It was fantastic but heavy. The Minox was a looser because the only magnification on which it was any good was 25X and despite is 56mm objective was not as good as the Leupold 52 or Bushnell 50.</p><p></p><p>I guess I'm a supporter for hydro-phobic coating and no more than 22 ounces.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rich Coyle, post: 1259380, member: 70559"] "I also checked into this comment on this forum and another forum. The reason all of these scopes have supporter clubs is......THEY WORK." Well, my Bushnells work now, but the first one sure didn't. And the repair didn't. For sure my Swarovskis z5s are all gone, but they were not the newest one. My VX-6 4-24X52 did not malfunction, but was heavier than a comparable Bushnell and its magnification range was less. The Nikon is gone because it doesn't have the hydro-phobic lens and fogged when I breathed on it in the last deer season. My Weaver V24 6-24X42, which never let me down, is for sale because I have decided to go all Bushnell to take advantage of the hydro-phobic coating. The Nightforce is gone because it was too heavy. It was fantastic but heavy. The Minox was a looser because the only magnification on which it was any good was 25X and despite is 56mm objective was not as good as the Leupold 52 or Bushnell 50. I guess I'm a supporter for hydro-phobic coating and no more than 22 ounces. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
vx-6 vs G7 vs Huskemaw
Top