Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Vortex Razor HD LHT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5RWill" data-source="post: 2445095" data-attributes="member: 98561"><p>In his defense the vortex products he recommends much like myself are not in the same category as the pst Gen I or diamondback tactical. Less i just haven't paid attention to his more budget oriented reviews. This is the point of my post earlier. While i agree it would leave a bad taste in my mouth we're discussing two very very different optics from the same company. Admittedly I've never owned a pst Gen I. My brother has the 1-4. I've had the 1-6 razor and pst Gen II without issue. He had for a while the 5-25 Gen II which we also never had issues with.</p><p></p><p>But on topic you're judging the entire brand from optics that really don't represent Vortex's QC at all. And a lot of which has changed tbh, at least in for the PST lineup. It would be like me writing off the mark 5 from leupold because one of my lower cost VXIIIs broke. It's not apples to apples in any shape form or fashion. The only similarity between the two scopes is that they're labeled under the brand Leupold.</p><p></p><p>Im not trying to change your opinion if i bought 3 products or so that all failed I'd stay away too. Just merely stating that this is a large reason vortex has this reputation. And it's not representative at all of their high end stuff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5RWill, post: 2445095, member: 98561"] In his defense the vortex products he recommends much like myself are not in the same category as the pst Gen I or diamondback tactical. Less i just haven’t paid attention to his more budget oriented reviews. This is the point of my post earlier. While i agree it would leave a bad taste in my mouth we’re discussing two very very different optics from the same company. Admittedly I’ve never owned a pst Gen I. My brother has the 1-4. I’ve had the 1-6 razor and pst Gen II without issue. He had for a while the 5-25 Gen II which we also never had issues with. But on topic you’re judging the entire brand from optics that really don’t represent Vortex’s QC at all. And a lot of which has changed tbh, at least in for the PST lineup. It would be like me writing off the mark 5 from leupold because one of my lower cost VXIIIs broke. It’s not apples to apples in any shape form or fashion. The only similarity between the two scopes is that they’re labeled under the brand Leupold. Im not trying to change your opinion if i bought 3 products or so that all failed I’d stay away too. Just merely stating that this is a large reason vortex has this reputation. And it’s not representative at all of their high end stuff. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Vortex Razor HD LHT
Top