Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
velocity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fitch" data-source="post: 540969" data-attributes="member: 19372"><p>I've found MV can differ from published MV by a surprising amount even in the same length barrel. I'd even go so far as to say the published MV are frequently almost useless beyond the conclusion that more powder will make the bullet go faster, and this powder might be faster than that powder. </p><p> </p><p>The same load can differ by 150 fps between two rifles of the same barrel length. IMO, there really isn't any good alternative to measuring MV if one want's to know how fast the bullet is going. </p><p> </p><p>Fitch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fitch, post: 540969, member: 19372"] I've found MV can differ from published MV by a surprising amount even in the same length barrel. I'd even go so far as to say the published MV are frequently almost useless beyond the conclusion that more powder will make the bullet go faster, and this powder might be faster than that powder. The same load can differ by 150 fps between two rifles of the same barrel length. IMO, there really isn't any good alternative to measuring MV if one want's to know how fast the bullet is going. Fitch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
velocity
Top