Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Velocity Testing CCI #200, CCI #34, Ginex Large Rifle Primers in .308 AR 10
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Veteran" data-source="post: 2942603" data-attributes="member: 118038"><p>I finally got around to running my tests. I started on this about a year ago, broke my chronograph, got busy, and never did it until now.</p><p></p><p>I did this with the new Garmin C-1 Zero. I exported excel CSV files and saved them as pdf s to post here.</p><p></p><p><strong>The #34 were only very slightly faster than the CCI 200's and Ginex. All very close together on velocity.</strong></p><p></p><p>CCI 200- 2876.9 fps</p><p>Ginex - 2883.5 fps</p><p>CCI #34- 2885.7 fps slightly faster but all close</p><p></p><p>The Standard Deviations for all were very good, CCI 200's the best, and the #34 the highest.</p><p></p><p>CCI 200 - 10.1 STDev</p><p>Ginex- 11.6 STDev</p><p>CCI #34 - 15.3 STDev</p><p></p><p>The Extreme spreads were in the same order as the STDev. CCI 200 best, CCI#34 worst.</p><p></p><p><strong>So, Ginex was pretty much in the middle in all of these shot strings of the CCI 200 and CCI 34's.</strong></p><p></p><p>Each (8 shot) shot string was fired in around a minute. So, relatively fast semi auto fire on each 8 shots because I was most interested</p><p>in velocities. But lo and behold, look at the target I shot up at 100 yards. That was really good 3 shot string accuracy for 24 shots</p><p>shooting that quickly. This rifle has a day/night digex C50 night vision scope, not even a Swarovski or Leopold.</p><p></p><p>A friend here on LRH built it for me last year. All the load info is posted on the following charts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Veteran, post: 2942603, member: 118038"] I finally got around to running my tests. I started on this about a year ago, broke my chronograph, got busy, and never did it until now. I did this with the new Garmin C-1 Zero. I exported excel CSV files and saved them as pdf s to post here. [B]The #34 were only very slightly faster than the CCI 200's and Ginex. All very close together on velocity.[/B] CCI 200- 2876.9 fps Ginex - 2883.5 fps CCI #34- 2885.7 fps slightly faster but all close The Standard Deviations for all were very good, CCI 200's the best, and the #34 the highest. CCI 200 - 10.1 STDev Ginex- 11.6 STDev CCI #34 - 15.3 STDev The Extreme spreads were in the same order as the STDev. CCI 200 best, CCI#34 worst. [B]So, Ginex was pretty much in the middle in all of these shot strings of the CCI 200 and CCI 34's.[/B] Each (8 shot) shot string was fired in around a minute. So, relatively fast semi auto fire on each 8 shots because I was most interested in velocities. But lo and behold, look at the target I shot up at 100 yards. That was really good 3 shot string accuracy for 24 shots shooting that quickly. This rifle has a day/night digex C50 night vision scope, not even a Swarovski or Leopold. A friend here on LRH built it for me last year. All the load info is posted on the following charts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Velocity Testing CCI #200, CCI #34, Ginex Large Rifle Primers in .308 AR 10
Top