Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Velocity question?s
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ken snyder" data-source="post: 527268" data-attributes="member: 26019"><p>It's still not a goal for a 300 WM. The military version (specs.) are asanine. Metal cohesively bonds ( welds itself together ) at about 92,000 psi this one is allowed a maximum of 78,900. It's not a 300WM, It uses the 300WM case. This is definately an ocassion that the cartridge should have a clear, descripitive name such as 6.5-284 vs. 6.5-284 Norma and probably another suffix like 6.5-284 Norma T. this is an example of Government cheapness, lots of money saved by pushing something past its limit instead of re-barreling and rechambering a zillion rifles, I guess in the military its better to have a few blow up rather than to try and keep track of who has what rifle and sending the wrong ammunition. We in the civilian sector do not need to play the games of a Jack *** movie. Want that vel. with that heavy of a bullet, then use a larger cartridge or star in your own movie, could be the new Darwin Awards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ken snyder, post: 527268, member: 26019"] It's still not a goal for a 300 WM. The military version (specs.) are asanine. Metal cohesively bonds ( welds itself together ) at about 92,000 psi this one is allowed a maximum of 78,900. It's not a 300WM, It uses the 300WM case. This is definately an ocassion that the cartridge should have a clear, descripitive name such as 6.5-284 vs. 6.5-284 Norma and probably another suffix like 6.5-284 Norma T. this is an example of Government cheapness, lots of money saved by pushing something past its limit instead of re-barreling and rechambering a zillion rifles, I guess in the military its better to have a few blow up rather than to try and keep track of who has what rifle and sending the wrong ammunition. We in the civilian sector do not need to play the games of a Jack *** movie. Want that vel. with that heavy of a bullet, then use a larger cartridge or star in your own movie, could be the new Darwin Awards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Velocity question?s
Top