Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
UPDATED: Head scratching day at the range
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="med358-boise" data-source="post: 2580281" data-attributes="member: 123832"><p>I think the OP is trying to find a good load. Conducting any load testing with 1 round per charge at 200, 400, or 600 is just not dispositive. At 400 and 600, other variables impact the results too much in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>My experience has been it is much more effecient to start with a load that is a "known good load at 100 yards" and then confirm its performance at 200, 400, and 600. As opposed to starting with data that is based on a) a sample size of 1 for each element of the analysis and b) where factors such as shooter error are magnified.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="med358-boise, post: 2580281, member: 123832"] I think the OP is trying to find a good load. Conducting any load testing with 1 round per charge at 200, 400, or 600 is just not dispositive. At 400 and 600, other variables impact the results too much in my opinion. My experience has been it is much more effecient to start with a load that is a "known good load at 100 yards" and then confirm its performance at 200, 400, and 600. As opposed to starting with data that is based on a) a sample size of 1 for each element of the analysis and b) where factors such as shooter error are magnified. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
UPDATED: Head scratching day at the range
Top