Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Understanding cartridge efficiency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Canhunter35" data-source="post: 1916860" data-attributes="member: 101677"><p>Another way to look at cartridge efficiency is chosen bullet in (x) magazine length at (x) velocity. So a 140gr 6.5 in 2.8" magazine a 6.5creedmoor is more efficient than the 260, but drop to a 130gr and the 260 becomes more efficient than the creed. </p><p>if you have 3.7" magazine and you're only using 3" of it with a saum but could be using 3.6" with a rem mag,it's arguable that the rem mag is more efficient than the saum lol</p><p>Just to stir this pot poo poo</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Canhunter35, post: 1916860, member: 101677"] Another way to look at cartridge efficiency is chosen bullet in (x) magazine length at (x) velocity. So a 140gr 6.5 in 2.8” magazine a 6.5creedmoor is more efficient than the 260, but drop to a 130gr and the 260 becomes more efficient than the creed. if you have 3.7” magazine and you’re only using 3” of it with a saum but could be using 3.6” with a rem mag,it’s arguable that the rem mag is more efficient than the saum lol Just to stir this pot poo poo [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Understanding cartridge efficiency
Top