Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
tripod set up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="huffsd" data-source="post: 436210" data-attributes="member: 11785"><p>That looks sweet. With that, would the rear "POLECAT" thing be needed? What is the basic rule of thumb? Is is better to let the rifle recoil freely resting on top of the rest? I have heard that having the rest secured to the stock plays havoc on repeatability. And the taller the legs of a secured rest, the wost it gets. Difference between a super low mounted Harris bench top bi bod vs the crazy 3 segmented Harris field model.</p><p> </p><p>Am i on the right track? Or is this one of those things like bullet seating depth? Every rifle is different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="huffsd, post: 436210, member: 11785"] That looks sweet. With that, would the rear "POLECAT" thing be needed? What is the basic rule of thumb? Is is better to let the rifle recoil freely resting on top of the rest? I have heard that having the rest secured to the stock plays havoc on repeatability. And the taller the legs of a secured rest, the wost it gets. Difference between a super low mounted Harris bench top bi bod vs the crazy 3 segmented Harris field model. Am i on the right track? Or is this one of those things like bullet seating depth? Every rifle is different. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
tripod set up
Top