Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Trijicon®, Inc. Goes Long-Range with TARS™ High-Performance RifleScope
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 618243" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>Well it would be my assumption that we both, as most, shoot center mass at long range varmints. But we both, as most, would shoot center vitals on game. So my point is, if you feel SFP is more precise for one, why not use it on both. You answer, if I read it correctly is that the big game target is bigger and the same precision of aiming is not needed. I feel it is, especially at the long distant shots where that "unimportant" inch or two can make a world of difference when needed. </p><p> </p><p>I just know this, I put my crosshairs on a huge number of elk every year. Some are observed at 1200 yards and way beyond. I will sight on them for practice, getting calm and use to the process, and being ready if I decide to take the shot. Bottom line for me is, the bigger the target and the finer the crosshairs, the better I feel. If there is a burr in their hair the size of a golfball near the sweet spot I will use it for point of aim or reference to point of aim. I do aim that small on game. Just like shooting a gopher sized target taped to their side.</p><p> </p><p>Over and out.</p><p> </p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 618243, member: 7503"] Well it would be my assumption that we both, as most, shoot center mass at long range varmints. But we both, as most, would shoot center vitals on game. So my point is, if you feel SFP is more precise for one, why not use it on both. You answer, if I read it correctly is that the big game target is bigger and the same precision of aiming is not needed. I feel it is, especially at the long distant shots where that "unimportant" inch or two can make a world of difference when needed. I just know this, I put my crosshairs on a huge number of elk every year. Some are observed at 1200 yards and way beyond. I will sight on them for practice, getting calm and use to the process, and being ready if I decide to take the shot. Bottom line for me is, the bigger the target and the finer the crosshairs, the better I feel. If there is a burr in their hair the size of a golfball near the sweet spot I will use it for point of aim or reference to point of aim. I do aim that small on game. Just like shooting a gopher sized target taped to their side. Over and out. Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Trijicon®, Inc. Goes Long-Range with TARS™ High-Performance RifleScope
Top