Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
TriggerTech vs Jewell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1465697" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>About 5 years ago I installed a 2 stage Huber Concepts set at 1.5# on my 300WM, an exceptionally accurate Remington Milspec 700. I will say that IMO, the Huber Concepts "physiological" design claims seem to have merit. As an aside, it does incorporate sufficient over-travel. With minimal use, very clean breaks for high precision shooting seems to become a thoughtless exercise. Also, the build quality is exceptional. I think the steep price and fixed settings limits it's broad use and popularity. </p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]qPAWMKSdkLc[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1465697, member: 10291"] About 5 years ago I installed a 2 stage Huber Concepts set at 1.5# on my 300WM, an exceptionally accurate Remington Milspec 700. I will say that IMO, the Huber Concepts “physiological” design claims seem to have merit. As an aside, it does incorporate sufficient over-travel. With minimal use, very clean breaks for high precision shooting seems to become a thoughtless exercise. Also, the build quality is exceptional. I think the steep price and fixed settings limits it’s broad use and popularity. [MEDIA=youtube]qPAWMKSdkLc[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
TriggerTech vs Jewell
Top