Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Torn between the 280 ai and the 7mm rem mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MudRunner2005" data-source="post: 1600578" data-attributes="member: 12995"><p>What do you consider right behind it? Unless it's inside of 75 FPS, I wouldn't call it "right behind it".</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong, I like both cartridges, but we gotta be realistic with our numbers here. 3,100 is considered average for a 26" 7RM with a 168, and 2,950-3,000 is conserved average for a 26" .280 AI with a 168. The difference is only 100-150 FPS, but it's still 100-150 FPS difference.</p><p></p><p>What powders were you using for each?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MudRunner2005, post: 1600578, member: 12995"] What do you consider right behind it? Unless it's inside of 75 FPS, I wouldn't call it "right behind it". Don't get me wrong, I like both cartridges, but we gotta be realistic with our numbers here. 3,100 is considered average for a 26" 7RM with a 168, and 2,950-3,000 is conserved average for a 26" .280 AI with a 168. The difference is only 100-150 FPS, but it's still 100-150 FPS difference. What powders were you using for each? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Torn between the 280 ai and the 7mm rem mag
Top