Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
This Should Make Some Heads Spin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEENIX" data-source="post: 2256327" data-attributes="member: 14204"><p><strong>"My" </strong>take ...</p><p></p><p><strong>Writer:</strong> Regardless of the topic, attention-getting is a strategy that most writers employ to get a reader interested. In this case, it worked because it made it here.</p><p></p><p><strong>Reader:</strong> Regardless of the topic, it is the reader's responsibility to synthesize the presented information.</p><p></p><p>The author only presented part of the factors to make a sound decision; luckily, <strong>"I"</strong> happen to know the pertinent information for my decision-making process because this is still a long-range hunting forum, when all possible, <strong>"I" </strong>always pick the best compromise with a bullet weight (<strong>"I"</strong> lean on heavy for caliber), construction/design, BC and propel it downrange with plenty of velocity and energy at POI (i.e., 1000 FT-LBS for deer and 1500 FT-LBS - <strong>"my"</strong> unwritten rule, and of course the minimum effective velocity for the bullet to expand effectively). </p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEENIX, post: 2256327, member: 14204"] [B]"My" [/B]take ... [B]Writer:[/B] Regardless of the topic, attention-getting is a strategy that most writers employ to get a reader interested. In this case, it worked because it made it here. [B]Reader:[/B] Regardless of the topic, it is the reader's responsibility to synthesize the presented information. The author only presented part of the factors to make a sound decision; luckily, [B]"I"[/B] happen to know the pertinent information for my decision-making process because this is still a long-range hunting forum, when all possible, [B]"I" [/B]always pick the best compromise with a bullet weight ([B]"I"[/B] lean on heavy for caliber), construction/design, BC and propel it downrange with plenty of velocity and energy at POI (i.e., 1000 FT-LBS for deer and 1500 FT-LBS - [B]"my"[/B] unwritten rule, and of course the minimum effective velocity for the bullet to expand effectively). Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
This Should Make Some Heads Spin
Top