Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Hog Hunting
Thermal Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="geo4061" data-source="post: 1280103" data-attributes="member: 81625"><p>Just got a chance to review the Reap-IR, Pulsar XD50, and monocular Pulsar Quantum HD385. The Reap is outstanding with great picture, easy target identification and light weight. It is a little difficult to operate especially for some one with a heavy touch. Operation is also complicated compared to the Pulsars. It was able to positively identify deer at 600 yards at night and 500 yards during the day. A Bobcat at 100 yards you could watch him lick his paws. The Pulsar XD50 was about half as effective. The cat at 100 could be identified by shape only. I could identify deer at 400 but only when they were broad side. Positive hog identification was good out to about 150 on a large hog. The pulsar was very simple and easy to use. The Pulsar monocular was easy to use and would find targets. Positive identification is difficult past 100.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="geo4061, post: 1280103, member: 81625"] Just got a chance to review the Reap-IR, Pulsar XD50, and monocular Pulsar Quantum HD385. The Reap is outstanding with great picture, easy target identification and light weight. It is a little difficult to operate especially for some one with a heavy touch. Operation is also complicated compared to the Pulsars. It was able to positively identify deer at 600 yards at night and 500 yards during the day. A Bobcat at 100 yards you could watch him lick his paws. The Pulsar XD50 was about half as effective. The cat at 100 could be identified by shape only. I could identify deer at 400 but only when they were broad side. Positive hog identification was good out to about 150 on a large hog. The pulsar was very simple and easy to use. The Pulsar monocular was easy to use and would find targets. Positive identification is difficult past 100. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Hog Hunting
Thermal Review
Top