Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Swift Scirocco VS Nosler Accubond & Elk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="K.E.C." data-source="post: 2875689" data-attributes="member: 86631"><p>I agree, I thought they were stronger. </p><p>Weatherby thinks so also. They use them in every caliber, with Great results. </p><p>Yes the first Scirocco was not very good, they make correction to the bullet, and I think the bonding wholed up very well. </p><p>This is my experience with them, been using them for over 20 years. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤓" title="Nerd face :nerd:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f913.png" data-shortname=":nerd:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="K.E.C., post: 2875689, member: 86631"] I agree, I thought they were stronger. Weatherby thinks so also. They use them in every caliber, with Great results. Yes the first Scirocco was not very good, they make correction to the bullet, and I think the bonding wholed up very well. This is my experience with them, been using them for over 20 years. 🤓 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Swift Scirocco VS Nosler Accubond & Elk
Top